I liked It (2017) for the sake of saying. Tons of good horror movies are loaded with 'jumpscares' but no one calls them that. Like a good movie with an unexplained plot element is 'mysterious' and 'thought provoking' but in a bad movie the same treatment will be accused of being a plot hole, or a failure on the part of the writers. People lodge these terms against bad movies, and don't lodge them against good movies, and that's not because bad movies have them and good movies don't, it's just that these are terms we use only when talking about bad movies. It's a weak criticism used by poor critics, especially pushed by people who don't know much about the horror genre. I can't say I blame him.'Jumpscare' is a non-argument criticism in general. It would have had an even more chilling effect on him as a young boy and he's just never been able to shake the fear since.

The implication is that Stanley has been looking at this painting for a long time, since he was an even younger child. Without going into spoiler territory, you can probably guess that things get significantly scarier than a painting hanging on the wall. It's a vaguely human-looking woman holding a flute, but the style of the painting has her looking distorted. Going into the office of his father the Rabbi, he is visibly shaken by a painting on the wall.

Stanley is a young Jewish boy on the eve of his Bar Mitzvah as IT opens. One of these new additions is the primary fear of the character of Stanley Uris, played by Wyatt Oleff. While the film adaptation of IT takes most of its inspiration directly from the Stephen King novel of the same name, there are also a number of aspects of the story which are modified, if not completely new. And it's something that actually, Stephen King, the first email he sent to Andy when he had seen the movie, the one fear he wrote back, he said, 'I fucking love the woman in the painting, it scared the shit out of me,' so.

Stephen king it full movie 2017 reddit